Tether sued over alleged unlawful $42.4M USDT freeze

cryptonews

11 hours ago

Two Thai businessmen sued Tether on Aug. 31 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the issuer’s authority to freeze approximately 42.4 million USDT before ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers | Global Stocks, Options & Futures Trading App","description":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","keywords":"tiger brokers,tiger trade,tiger brokers singapore,broker online,stock trading in singapore,share trading singapore,brokerage firm singapore,trading app,stock broker singapore,stock trading platforms,trading account","social":{"ogDescription":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://au1.tigermoments.com/news/2664989933"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2664989933\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2664989933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-09-02 12:26","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2664989933","market":"other","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Tether sued over alleged unlawful $42.4M USDT freeze","media":"cryptonews","content":"<div>\n<p>Two Thai businessmen sued Tether on Aug. 31 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the issuer’s authority to freeze approximately 42.4 million USDT before ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/tether-sued-over-alleged-unlawful-42-4m-usdt-freeze/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"crypto_news_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tether sued over alleged unlawful $42.4M USDT freeze</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTether sued over alleged unlawful $42.4M USDT freeze\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-09-02 12:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://crypto.news/tether-sued-over-alleged-unlawful-42-4m-usdt-freeze/><strong>cryptonews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two Thai businessmen sued Tether on Aug. 31 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the issuer’s authority to freeze approximately 42.4 million USDT before ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/tether-sued-over-alleged-unlawful-42-4m-usdt-freeze/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"TETH","symbol_name":"21Shares Ethereum ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://crypto.news/tether-sued-over-alleged-unlawful-42-4m-usdt-freeze/","article_id":"2664989933","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"crypto_news_highlight","url":"https://crypto.news/tether-sued-over-alleged-unlawful-42-4m-usdt-freeze/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2664989933","pubTimestamp":1788323195,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"crypto_news_highlight","name":"Crypto News"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Two Thai businessmen sued Tether on Aug. 31 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the issuer’s authority to freeze approximately 42.4 million USDT before authorities secured a seizure warrant.Tether faces a New York lawsuit over 42.4 million USDT frozen after an HSI request.Plaintiffs allege no warrant or court order existed when Tether blacklisted their ten Ethereum addresses.A February seizure warrant directed Tether to burn USDT and reissue tokens into government custody.Prosecutors separately said over 61 million USDT was traced to wallets linked with investment fraud.Nutthawat Rukthammachalern and Natthawat Kasamvilas allege in their complaint that Tether blacklisted ten Ethereum addresses containing precisely 42,417,785.62 USDT on Oct. 30, 2025. The allegations have not been adjudicated, and Tether had not filed a public response as of Sept. 2.Five days later, federal prosecutors announced the seizure of more than $61 million in USDT. Inves","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"crypto.news","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"TETH":"21Shares Ethereum ETF","ESK":"REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF","ETCO":"Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF","ETHI":"Defiance Leveraged Long Income Ethereum ETF","SETH":"1倍做空以太币期货ETF-Proshares","ETQ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF","HSI":"恒生指数"},"translate_title":"泰达币就涉嫌非法冻结 4,240 万美元 USDT 提起诉讼","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"TETH":0.6,"ETQ":0.6,"HSI":0.6,"ETHI":0.6,"ESK":0.6,"SETH":0.6,"ETCO":0.6},"content_text":"Two Thai businessmen sued Tether on Aug. 31 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the issuer’s authority to freeze approximately 42.4 million USDT before authorities secured a seizure warrant.\n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nTether faces a New York lawsuit over 42.4 million USDT frozen after an HSI request.\nPlaintiffs allege no warrant or court order existed when Tether blacklisted their ten Ethereum addresses.\nA February seizure warrant directed Tether to burn USDT and reissue tokens into government custody.\nProsecutors separately said over 61 million USDT was traced to wallets linked with investment fraud.\nPlaintiffs seek declaratory relief, an injunction, damages, reserve income disgorgement, and punitive damages from Tether.\n\n\n\nNutthawat Rukthammachalern and Natthawat Kasamvilas allege in their complaint that Tether blacklisted ten Ethereum addresses containing precisely 42,417,785.62 USDT on Oct. 30, 2025. The allegations have not been adjudicated, and Tether had not filed a public response as of Sept. 2.\n\nUPDATE – It appears that the $42.4M Tether freeze in this suit stems from a North Carolina pig-butchering case.HSI Raleigh opened it from a victim tip: romance/investment fraud, fake trading platform, then layering through wallets so the stolen USDT would look clean. On… https://t.co/W4bLfkIYRv— Ariel Givner (@GivnerAriel) September 1, 2026\n\nTether allegedly acted before obtaining legal process\nThe plaintiffs claim Tether acted after receiving an informal request from a Homeland Security Investigations agent. They contend no warrant, court order, subpoena or other formal legal process authorized the initial freeze.\nKasamvilas discovered the restriction after attempting a transaction, according to the filing. When he contacted Tether, the company allegedly referred him to an HSI agent’s email address without explaining its legal basis for blocking the funds.\nThe complaint says Tether used the addBlackList function within its Ethereum smart contract. This prevents tokens at designated addresses from moving. Another function, destroyBlackFunds, allows Tether to burn blacklisted USDT.\nThe plaintiffs say they acquired the tokens through secondary-market business transactions and had no direct customer relationship with Tether. They argue that possessing technical control over the smart contract does not automatically give Tether legal authority over tokens held by third parties.\nA later warrant targeted tokens linked to alleged fraud\nOn Feb. 19, 2026, a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of North Carolina issued seizure warrant 5:26-MJ-1267-JG. According to the New York complaint, the warrant described a process under which Tether would burn USDT at the identified addresses, mint an equivalent amount and transfer the replacement tokens to a government-controlled wallet.\nFive days later, federal prosecutors announced the seizure of more than $61 million in USDT. Investigators alleged that the targeted wallets received proceeds from cryptocurrency investment scams commonly called pig-butchering schemes.\nHSI reportedly opened the investigation after receiving a victim’s tip. Investigators traced funds through multiple wallets that authorities said were used to obscure the money’s source, ownership and connection to fake trading platforms.\nThe Justice Department thanked Tether for assisting with the asset transfer. Tether separately confirmed its involvement in the broader $61 million operation.\nHowever, the new complaint says the plaintiffs’ specific 42.4 million USDT remained frozen when the case was filed. It seeks to prevent Tether from burning those tokens. The available records therefore do not establish that the disputed tokens had already been transferred to the government wallet.\nTether lawsuit tests stablecoin issuers’ freezing powers\nThe plaintiffs do not merely challenge the government’s tracing allegations. Their case focuses on whether a private stablecoin issuer may restrict secondary-market tokens after an informal law-enforcement request and before receiving judicial authorization.\nThey also argue the February warrant could not retroactively validate Tether’s October action. The complaint further disputes whether a seizure warrant permits burning the named property and replacing it with newly minted tokens before a final forfeiture judgment.\nThe claims include conversion, trespass to chattels, unjust enrichment and requests for declaratory and injunctive relief. The businessmen want Tether ordered to remove the blacklist, pay damages if the tokens are destroyed and surrender income allegedly earned from reserves supporting the frozen USDT.\nTether’s law-enforcement powers operate at a considerable scale. As crypto.news previously reported, the company froze $514 million across 370 addresses during one 30-day period in 2026. Its 2025 blacklist covered 4,163 Ethereum and Tron addresses, according to BlockSec data cited in that report.\nThe next procedural step will be service of the complaint and Tether’s response. The court could also consider an early injunction request if the plaintiffs seek immediate protection against burning or reissuing the disputed tokens.\nSeparately, the plaintiffs told the New York court that they filed an application in North Carolina on July 31 seeking the return of the USDT. Neither proceeding has produced a judgment on ownership, forfeiture or Tether’s liability.\n\n\n\n\n\n                Read more:\n            \n\n                Bitcoin price tumbles as US strikes rattle global markets","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"policyRegulatory","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}