Robinhood-AMC clash may speed US stock token rules

cryptonews

15 hours ago

Robinhood has rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to halt an AMC-linked token, turning a dispute over one of its 189 stock products into a test of how US rules may treat third-party tokenized equities...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers | Global Stocks, Options & Futures Trading App","description":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","keywords":"tiger brokers,tiger trade,tiger brokers singapore,broker online,stock trading in singapore,share trading singapore,brokerage firm singapore,trading app,stock broker singapore,stock trading platforms,trading account","social":{"ogDescription":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://au1.tigermoments.com/news/2665514863"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2665514863\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2665514863?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-09-05 04:24","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2665514863","market":"sg","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Robinhood-AMC clash may speed US stock token rules","media":"cryptonews","content":"<div>\n<p>Robinhood has rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to halt an AMC-linked token, turning a dispute over one of its 189 stock products into a test of how US rules may treat third-party tokenized equities...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/robinhood-amc-clash-may-speed-us-stock-token-rules/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"crypto_news_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Robinhood-AMC clash may speed US stock token rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRobinhood-AMC clash may speed US stock token rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-09-05 04:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://crypto.news/robinhood-amc-clash-may-speed-us-stock-token-rules/><strong>cryptonews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Robinhood has rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to halt an AMC-linked token, turning a dispute over one of its 189 stock products into a test of how US rules may treat third-party tokenized equities...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/robinhood-amc-clash-may-speed-us-stock-token-rules/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"https://crypto.news/robinhood-amc-clash-may-speed-us-stock-token-rules/","article_id":"2665514863","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"crypto_news_highlight","url":"https://crypto.news/robinhood-amc-clash-may-speed-us-stock-token-rules/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2665514863","pubTimestamp":1788553444,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"crypto_news_highlight","name":"Crypto News"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Robinhood has rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to halt an AMC-linked token, turning a dispute over one of its 189 stock products into a test of how US rules may treat third-party tokenized equities.Robinhood’s legal chief told AMC to send its lawyers after the theater chain demanded a trading halt.AMC token holders receive economic exposure but do not own shares or acquire shareholder rights.RedStone says issuer consent and securities registration will determine which tokenization models survive.SEC advisers have sought clear ownership disclosures and oversight for third-party tokenized securities.Robinhood chief legal officer Dan Gallagher refused AMC CEO Adam Aron’s demand to stop trading tokens tied to the company’s stock, writing on X that the brokerage would not “DECIST” before telling AMC to “send your lawyers.”Robinhood-AMC clash moves from objection to legal threat. According to the company’s Stock Token documentation, each ERC-20 token corresponds to a particular s","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"crypto.news","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"Robinhood 与 AMC 的冲突可能会加速美国股票代币规则","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26972ae8464fa35f66f58411b6f49b89","symbols_score_info":{"HOOD":1.97,"AMC":1.95,"HOOC":0.6,"HOOX":0.6,"ROBN":0.6,"HOYY":0.6,"HODU":0.6,"HOOW":0.6,"HOOY":0.6,"CRPT":0.6,"IAI":0.6,"FINX":0.6,"BPAY":0.6,"HOOZ":0.6,"HOOI":0.6,"BLCK":0.6,"HOII":0.6,"HOOG":0.6},"content_text":"Robinhood has rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to halt an AMC-linked token, turning a dispute over one of its 189 stock products into a test of how US rules may treat third-party tokenized equities.\n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nRobinhood’s legal chief told AMC to send its lawyers after the theater chain demanded a trading halt.\nAMC token holders receive economic exposure but do not own shares or acquire shareholder rights.\nRedStone says issuer consent and securities registration will determine which tokenization models survive.\nSEC advisers have sought clear ownership disclosures and oversight for third-party tokenized securities.\n\n\n\nRobinhood chief legal officer Dan Gallagher refused AMC CEO Adam Aron’s demand to stop trading tokens tied to the company’s stock, writing on X that the brokerage would not “DECIST” before telling AMC to “send your lawyers.”\n\nWe know a little something about the U.S. securities laws and will not “DECIST.”  Send your lawyers and we’ll educate them. https://t.co/hz8dH2bz8G— Dan Gallagher (@DanGallagherDC) September 4, 2026\n\nRobinhood CEO Vlad Tenev backed Gallagher’s response minutes later, saying the company stood behind its Stock Tokens. The statements escalated a public disagreement that began when Aron said AMC had neither approved nor participated in the product.\nRobinhood-AMC clash moves from objection to legal threat\nAron initially accused Robinhood of marketing a security connected to AMC without the company’s authorization. As crypto.news reported earlier, the theater executive described the product as “contemptible” and said outside securities counsel would examine the matter.\nAfter Tenev asked him to explain his concerns, Aron argued that Robinhood had created a synthetic market through a unit based in Jersey, outside the United States. According to the AMC chief, stock-token buyers do not receive the voting, ownership, or other rights held by ordinary shareholders.\nAron also claimed that a separate market-tracking AMC could interfere with the company’s control over its capital-raising activity. He called on Robinhood to “cease and desist” voluntarily and said AMC would consider asking the Securities and Exchange Commission to review the arrangement.\nNo lawsuit or SEC enforcement action against Robinhood’s AMC product had been announced at the time of publication. Aron’s statements therefore remain allegations rather than findings that Robinhood violated US securities laws.\nGallagher, who served as an SEC commissioner between 2011 and 2015, rejected the demand without giving a detailed legal response. Tenev later reposted Gallagher’s message and reiterated Robinhood’s support for the product.\nRobinhood stock tokens provide exposure without AMC ownership\nRobinhood’s documents describe the assets as tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, rather than shares issued by the companies they track.\nAccording to the company’s Stock Token documentation, each ERC-20 token corresponds to a particular stock or exchange-traded fund and uses a Chainlink data feed to publish its reference price onchain. Robinhood says the tokens are backed one-for-one by underlying shares held with a licensed custodian.\nOwnership of a token, however, does not give its holder legal or beneficial rights against AMC or any other referenced company. Token holders cannot vote as AMC shareholders, and their claims depend on their contractual relationship with the Jersey issuer.\nRobinhood says investors can sell the tokens in secondary markets or redeem them with the issuer after completing identity and anti-money laundering checks. If the issuer becomes insolvent, the company says an independent security agent would sell the underlying shares and arrange cash payments to eligible token holders.\nCorporate actions also follow a different process from conventional share ownership. Robinhood manages dividends and stock splits through an onchain multiplier that adjusts the number of shares represented by each token without changing the holder’s raw token balance.\nThe company’s July 2026 quarterly filing states that approvals obtained in Jersey do not amount to regulatory endorsement or prudential supervision. Liechtenstein’s Financial Market Authority approved the base prospectus for completeness, consistency and ease of understanding under the EU Prospectus Regulation, but Robinhood’s filing says the decision should not be treated as an endorsement of the issuer or its products.\nStock Tokens have not been registered under the US Securities Act and cannot be offered, sold or delivered in the United States or to US persons. Restrictions also apply in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland, according to Robinhood.\nFor American investors, the restrictions mean an AMC token cannot currently serve as an alternative to buying AMC shares through a US broker. Robinhood nevertheless acknowledged in its filing that the product could expose the company to regulatory, litigation, contractual, operational, and reputational risks.\nRedStone sees consent and registration as the dividing line\nMarcin Kaźmierczak, co-founder of blockchain oracle provider RedStone, told crypto.news that AMC’s objection concerns how Robinhood structured and issued the asset, rather than the use of blockchain technology.\n\n“This dispute is not a tokenization problem. Robinhood wrapped a public company’s shares into an offshore, unregistered derivative without notifying the company, so this reaction was predictable. It’s a consent and registration issue.”\n\nKaźmierczak said the products most likely to survive regulatory review would involve the referenced company and comply with securities requirements from launch. In his view, an issuer-backed instrument has a stronger path than a synthetic product designed to operate outside US securities registration.\n\n“Expect this fight to speed up the push for an actual U.S. framework rather than slow tokenization down.”\n\nHis comments describe an expected policy effect and do not establish that public companies presently have a legal right to approve every third-party derivative that references their shares. The legality of Robinhood’s structure would depend on the applicable securities, derivatives, disclosure, and marketing rules, as well as the jurisdictions in which the product is offered.\nRWA.xyz data placed the value of distributed tokenized stocks at approximately $2.91 billion on Sept. 4, up 17.5% over 30 days. The tracker listed 5,245 products and put Robinhood sixth among tracked platforms, with 189 assets carrying a combined value of about $103.2 million.\nUS rules distinguish ownership from synthetic exposure\nThe SEC’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets drew a formal distinction between issuer-sponsored and third-party tokenized securities in a January staff statement.\nUnder an issuer-sponsored model, a company or its agent can record the security directly on a blockchain or use a token to initiate changes in an offchain shareholder register. A third party can also tokenize another company’s security, but the SEC staff said the resulting product may not provide an ownership interest or contractual claim against the original issuer.\nThird-party structures can expose buyers to risks connected to the token provider, including its possible bankruptcy, which a direct holder of the underlying stock may not face, according to the SEC statement.\nIn February, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee recommended mandatory disclosures that explain token holders’ ownership rights. The committee also called for SEC, state, or Financial Industry Regulatory Authority oversight of intermediaries and trading protections designed to give investors the best available execution terms.\nTwo securities transfer groups later pressed for issuer-backed products while asking the SEC to limit relief for unaffiliated tokens. Continental Stock Transfer & Trust and the Securities Transfer Association argued that third-party products could confuse investors about custody, dividends, voting, insolvency claims, and the identity of the legal shareholder.\nThe SEC has separately been preparing a limited route for tokenized stocks that could allow selected platforms to test continuous trading under defined conditions. No final eligibility rules or implementation date have been announced, and existing federal securities requirements remain in force.\nNasdaq received SEC approval for a pilot in March covering eligible Russell 1000 securities and major index-linked ETFs. Under the approved structure, participants can select traditional or tokenized settlement while receiving the same rights and pricing attached to the underlying securities.\n\n\n\n\n\n                Read more:\n            \n\n                DefiLlama and Forgd introduce institutional token grades, but warn that AAA does not mean risk-free","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}